After reading "Free the Goldfish" I think that animals should have representation in government ,because animals can feel pain and can have humane thoughts of love and grief.The inhumane act of trafficking illegal animals can affect many.The pain and the risk to the animals and humans. Trafficking can bring diseases and can be very harmful to humans such as the ebola outbreak caused by an illegally brought Zaire Monkey.

The pain that animals feel is unfair and their treatment can cause diseases to the way that they are killed or where there are . The inhumane treatment can cause break out of E.Coli. the trafficking of animals in various cases have caused environmental and  health issues.The Ebola outbreak could prevented because of ones unjustifiable put an innocent Zaire monkey in the into the wild while causes a huge health crisis. Bullfrogs that once used to remove bugs managed to bring another race to the brink of extinction.

Animals need protection from us and for our safety. All living things dont want to live just to be slaughtered. We should at least make this process less painful. No one should feel the excruciating pain of having your limbs chopped of our being shot in the head

In the book the Candymakers Money is a major part of the plot .This is because many of the main character are aiming for their candy to be produced worldwide . Daisy and Philip are main characters who aim for money. The author uses this initial greed to show their gradual change.

Logan and Miles are working to make the best candy and Daisy and Philip are

aiming to dominate the competition. They both realize a plot where the secret ingredient may be stolen. Daisy initially planning to steal it  shows character change when she protects the secret ingredient. Philip also show that his past greediness is no longer there when he learns his father's plan to  shut down the company.He actually stops the thief and bets with his father to stop  trying to run the company.

The money in the story was very important because it help show the change within the character because the author manages to show change very well. Money also was used to advance the  allowing philip to advance in the tournament and also managed to help

Choose an Article.

            I chose the article “Justice Denied” from Upfront magazine. I chose this because exactly as the title say many people were denied trial because many of the witnesses and evidence that were present and could have used back in the 1950’s are now missing. What is more is the motives of the murderers are clear ,this was all about race and occurred in the civil rights movement . Even if during the time period the case was made, the police were uncooperative.  Many were fearful of their lives and even though they had the first amendment on their side they were afraid to speak, in fear of attacks  on them. There were also may terrorist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan who were conducting these murders in the first place.  What is the saddest part of all is that many lacked faith in the Judicial system. The cases are now reopened and many cannot be solved. Richard Cohen states ”The reality is that justice in a few cases is going to have to serve as  a proxy for justice in them all.” That is insult to injury opening a case then refusing to solve it even when someone has passed away.   

            This makes me think about my life and how many of those cases weren't opened even when murder had occurred and makes me somewhat doubt the Judicial branch’s credibility. I also linked this article to the George Zimmerman case. They make a huge deal about a racial killing but ignore proven racial killings such as the Frank Morris case. The many killings that occur now seem a bit more important to me as well. I also look at the judicial branch with a bit more unease because I don't really support their way of handling the situation.                                                                                          

Dear Mrs Berner Essay on book banning.

Dear Mrs. Berner

    

In my opinion, young adult  books should not be banned, regardless of the child's age or content, including sixth graders. A child can read whatever their parents see fit ,and if their guardians support this type of literature then they should have access to it. Ellen Hopkins the author of Crank essentially agreed stating “If you don't want your child to read a book take it away ". She then goes on to express how parents have no control over children except of their own . In present times, young adult fiction does have grotesque content but many still enjoy reading it ,so banning is not the solution. Warnings of explicit content allows children to be aware of  the  mature nature of the material and whether it is appropriate or not for them to read. In addition, such instructions promotes the monitoring for the parents. The most important factor of all is however is that one person cannot be allowed to ban the book for everyone because there are many whom could still enjoy them.

These young adult books should be kept because of the many who enjoy reading them, and one's personal opinion cannot be put over the educational benefits for many. Bill Moyer also expresses his opinion stating one person cannot "deny an entire community's curiosity." This means that one person cannot ban a book for many . Regardless of the graphic content of the books , children can easily choose not to read them or simply get a different one. Sherman Alexie, the author of The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, states that many adults are only protecting their idea of what literature should be. This is true, just by looking at how many books are challenged by adults, the mature people. Banning young adult books should refer to the children, because it is them who are really affected. The most effective way to have both ways is warning those who don't want the explicit content about it, and those interested end up with a section of books that they like.

Take recently the challenge of a classic Fahrenheit 451. Diana Verm and her father objected the book and although given an alternate assignment her father insisted on  the book's removal from the curriculum. The main reason for this request was the description of  the burning of a bible. What they don't understand is that the author wanted that portrayal to be disturbing. It was a dystopian world after all! The  message of the entire book was that banning free thought and books is unhealthy for the public. Ellen Hopkins expresses her opinion by stating " I don't sugarcoat but neither is the content gratuitous, something would be censors could only know if they'd actually read the books rather than skimming for dirty words." In this case there were also many objections with students speaking in support of the books. Showing the difference between those who read and those who censor This shows how adults have their own privileged opinion of what literature should be.

  

Parental control should be exercised on individual base, for the need of each family and child. The individual parent should be responsible for drawing the limits of supervision of sensitive material. As long as a warning is made public and children are aware of what they are about to read, there is no need to ban the material. After all it is picked by their own choice. If books were to be banned, in the first place, children should have the say somewhat in the decision making, instead of having grown ups try to comprehend children's literature. There is a reason why there are books for children and books for adults.

Inquiry question for nonfiction article.

     Tensions are rising between Obama and Putin ,Russia's president ,as Syria is unseeing weapons of mass destruction. This is not helped by the fact that Edward Snowden an information leaker has been granted asylum by Russia and that all aide provided by America has been ordered to leave. All though there is constant bickering between the two countries; what would happen if they worked together. Thomas Friedman in the passage " A New Cold War ?" states " there is no major problem and the world today ... that would not be easier to solve if the US and Russia work together?" This is true because many major issues involving U.S and Russia.

     The author shows this is true by listing all the issues involving the two countries. The author first shows issues such as the banning of American aide , prohibiting the adoption of Russian children by Americans, and reprimanding nonviolent protesters requesting a more democratic government . This includes the more recent Edward Snowden case  where Russia is granting asylum to him against U.S's approval. They all could be solved with cooperation and even Syria could be stopped . Russia supplies Syria with billions of dollars worth of weapons , then blocking any action U.S can do to stop it. If they agreed the weapon dealing could be stopped there could be possible world threat could be prevented as well. This includes the massive amounts of oil Russia has in its arsenal which along with the currenttechnology  could last a lot longer.

      Thomas Friedman is right with the  cooperation of these two countries a lot could be done. There could be the removal of another dictator who harms his citizens. There could also be the capture of someone who leaked out confidential information . There also could be aide given to those in Russia who need it and a home for a child. In conclusion if these countries cooperate a lot could be done recently Russia and America have just worked out a deal for Syria to remove its chemical weapons and much more could happen in the future.

Inquiry question for non fiction.

     Sally Green burg of the National Consumers League notes that "child labor perpetuated a cycle of poverty "and what this means is that the two issues were linked. This cycle is still in effect today in places without child labor laws. The only way to break this cycle is to place labor laws to prevent the the usage of a child workforce.

     Child labor started a cycle of poverty, because families still kept the practices they had when they were farmers this included working with their families.Then factory owners only hired children for cheap labor and their relunctance to speak against their bosses. The passage even states "Factory owners liked hiring children for their nimble fingers and relunctance to complain. They could also pay them less". Some examples of pay were boys as old as eight separating coal and slate in hazardous conditions for one to three dollars a week. This lead to a lack of jobs because children were prefered and due to low pay the children couldn't support the family.

      This cycle is till in effect today In India recently a photo was was taken of an eight year old shoveling coal in northeast India. There are also many children still hired outside our country. The National Consumers League reported that there are 250 million children under the age of sixteen who are working mainly in factories or mines. Periodic exposes  shows how many children worked in garment factories for popular brands in the U.S

      This cycle can only be stopped by removing child labor and placing laws to make sure this doesn't happen there should be a serious fine that is more than the profit made. There is also a need for regular checks to. The national consumers league is correct and we are lucky that child labor is banned in the states  with exceptions such as agriculture. It is still an issue outside the issue and American industries are taking others countries' lack of labor laws to bypass ours. This is unacceptable because they are still hiring children. In conclusion there is still child labor and only other countries can solve this for themselves because as Sallly Greenburg said child labor states a cycle of poverty.

Inquiry question for nonfiction

     In the text " The End of America's Car Culture" a researcher, Thilo Koslowski states that the iPhone is the ford mustang of today. This means that today the iPhone is similar to the Ford because of its popularity, which is similar becuause of how popular the Ford Mustang was. This statement is true just like with cars after World War 2 everyone has an iPhone yet it is still popular and nobody is tired of it.

    The way the author supports this idea  with a quote the parent " If I talk to m parents about cars, they remember how everyone spent their weekends working on cars". Then compare this to the iPhone and iPad ,everyone works on them from a phone call all the way to this blog post being completed on my iPad. To even further support how desirable cars are the author brings in Mimi Sheller, director of Drexel university's Center for Mobilites Reaserch and Policy who quotes " Everybody wanted a car. Everybody wanted to drive." The author then states how cellphone apps used for carpooling have also been related to the decline in car usage. This directly relates to the iPhone and it's apps or applications and shows how versatile the phone is there is an app for anything, another reason the product is so popular. This also relates to cars as well because just like the phone during  age where cars were popular specific things were made for the new product drive in fast food joints, drive in movie theaters, and Shopping malls.

    Thilo Koslowski was not far off. Both the car and the iPhone are or we're popular, both hads things dedicated to them apps or drive ins, and there are also the fact that nearly everyone has one and how desirable they are. The comparison between the two is accurate both had there popularity and just like the Ford, Apples popularity has decreased after the realease of iPhone 5c.