Sonnet

Shall I compare thee to a good doughnut

So simple but able to provide joy

So simple, above the rest by one cut

One look and I  already know my choice 

A huge variety all different 

but you are the only one I can see 

Always near my side and being brilliant 

beauty as wide and  boundless as the seas

but you're more valuable,you stand by me

You're love is free and far more sweeter

 So kind and carefree,happy like a bee

My life was good but you made it neater

Although food provides temporary comfort

Your happiness is worth any effort

In Martin Espada’s three poems “The New Bathroom Policy at English High School”,” Revolutionary Spanish Lesson”, “Two Mexicans Lynched in Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877”. He shows discrimination of his culture. These poems show many ways that Latino Americans have their culture denied whether it be not allowing them to speak their Native language, or going as far as to killing them just because of one's selfish sense of justice. Martin Espada uses his poems to show how unnoticed discrimination against Latino Americans is as well as the levels of unjust persecution his culture faces.

In”Two Mexicans Lynched in Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877” two Mexicans were lynched for unjust and despicable reasons. Martin Espada uses the unjustified murder and absence of this news to the public to show how nobody noticed this and also to show the denial of his culture. They deny showing this or remotely making it noticeable despite the fact that it is murder. During the time period of the lynching many did not accept the idea of Mexicans and many tried to put law into their hands. This led to the murder of Latin Americans which shows the  unwillingness to accept of his culture. This also shows how far others will go to misuse their power for their own ideals, and show their disapproval of another race.

In “The New Bathroom Policy at English High School” the author shows that just because of the children making fun of him a principal tries to deny their culture and native language to feel unthreatened by his lack of understanding. Martin Espada shows how petty discrimination can be and the lengths that some go to feel safe. He also shows how many abuse their power. He shows the complete irony of the situation and how discrimination was brought through and one of the reasons for discrimination. He also reveals to us that just because one wants to control they will misuse power just like the principal. The principal banns Spanish in the bathrooms and does this so he can know everything that goes on .This completely shows denial of one’s culture just for the sake of control and a sense of security

Finally in his poem "Revolutionary Spanish Lesson “Martin Espada uses many metaphors. The mispronunciation  that he mentions is a metaphor  for those who deny his culture for example kind of like how they don’t try to pronounce it correctly as in denying that he is Spanish in the first place.  The bilingual swat team is also another detail that shows that they only recognize his Latino culture until he is a threat. There was also another detail although unintentional applies to today the republicans from Wisconsin, currently the Republicans are against immigration and against support illegal immigrants.

Martin Espada uses these three poems to show the different levels of discrimination. He also shows us the abuse of power. The many white people using their power persecute and murder people just because they didn’t have the most favorable of opinions of them.  These three poems show the levels of discrimination it could be denying their language, denying the fact that they are Black, White, or Latino, and go as far as murder. He shows how whether small or large how pointless and unreasonable the “reasons” for discrimination are.  

After reading "Free the Goldfish" I think that animals should have representation in government ,because animals can feel pain and can have humane thoughts of love and grief.The inhumane act of trafficking illegal animals can affect many.The pain and the risk to the animals and humans. Trafficking can bring diseases and can be very harmful to humans such as the ebola outbreak caused by an illegally brought Zaire Monkey.

The pain that animals feel is unfair and their treatment can cause diseases to the way that they are killed or where there are . The inhumane treatment can cause break out of E.Coli. the trafficking of animals in various cases have caused environmental and  health issues.The Ebola outbreak could prevented because of ones unjustifiable put an innocent Zaire monkey in the into the wild while causes a huge health crisis. Bullfrogs that once used to remove bugs managed to bring another race to the brink of extinction.

Animals need protection from us and for our safety. All living things dont want to live just to be slaughtered. We should at least make this process less painful. No one should feel the excruciating pain of having your limbs chopped of our being shot in the head

In the book the Candymakers Money is a major part of the plot .This is because many of the main character are aiming for their candy to be produced worldwide . Daisy and Philip are main characters who aim for money. The author uses this initial greed to show their gradual change.

Logan and Miles are working to make the best candy and Daisy and Philip are

aiming to dominate the competition. They both realize a plot where the secret ingredient may be stolen. Daisy initially planning to steal it  shows character change when she protects the secret ingredient. Philip also show that his past greediness is no longer there when he learns his father's plan to  shut down the company.He actually stops the thief and bets with his father to stop  trying to run the company.

The money in the story was very important because it help show the change within the character because the author manages to show change very well. Money also was used to advance the  allowing philip to advance in the tournament and also managed to help

Choose an Article.

            I chose the article “Justice Denied” from Upfront magazine. I chose this because exactly as the title say many people were denied trial because many of the witnesses and evidence that were present and could have used back in the 1950’s are now missing. What is more is the motives of the murderers are clear ,this was all about race and occurred in the civil rights movement . Even if during the time period the case was made, the police were uncooperative.  Many were fearful of their lives and even though they had the first amendment on their side they were afraid to speak, in fear of attacks  on them. There were also may terrorist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan who were conducting these murders in the first place.  What is the saddest part of all is that many lacked faith in the Judicial system. The cases are now reopened and many cannot be solved. Richard Cohen states ”The reality is that justice in a few cases is going to have to serve as  a proxy for justice in them all.” That is insult to injury opening a case then refusing to solve it even when someone has passed away.   

            This makes me think about my life and how many of those cases weren't opened even when murder had occurred and makes me somewhat doubt the Judicial branch’s credibility. I also linked this article to the George Zimmerman case. They make a huge deal about a racial killing but ignore proven racial killings such as the Frank Morris case. The many killings that occur now seem a bit more important to me as well. I also look at the judicial branch with a bit more unease because I don't really support their way of handling the situation.                                                                                          

Dear Mrs Berner Essay on book banning.

Dear Mrs. Berner

    

In my opinion, young adult  books should not be banned, regardless of the child's age or content, including sixth graders. A child can read whatever their parents see fit ,and if their guardians support this type of literature then they should have access to it. Ellen Hopkins the author of Crank essentially agreed stating “If you don't want your child to read a book take it away ". She then goes on to express how parents have no control over children except of their own . In present times, young adult fiction does have grotesque content but many still enjoy reading it ,so banning is not the solution. Warnings of explicit content allows children to be aware of  the  mature nature of the material and whether it is appropriate or not for them to read. In addition, such instructions promotes the monitoring for the parents. The most important factor of all is however is that one person cannot be allowed to ban the book for everyone because there are many whom could still enjoy them.

These young adult books should be kept because of the many who enjoy reading them, and one's personal opinion cannot be put over the educational benefits for many. Bill Moyer also expresses his opinion stating one person cannot "deny an entire community's curiosity." This means that one person cannot ban a book for many . Regardless of the graphic content of the books , children can easily choose not to read them or simply get a different one. Sherman Alexie, the author of The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, states that many adults are only protecting their idea of what literature should be. This is true, just by looking at how many books are challenged by adults, the mature people. Banning young adult books should refer to the children, because it is them who are really affected. The most effective way to have both ways is warning those who don't want the explicit content about it, and those interested end up with a section of books that they like.

Take recently the challenge of a classic Fahrenheit 451. Diana Verm and her father objected the book and although given an alternate assignment her father insisted on  the book's removal from the curriculum. The main reason for this request was the description of  the burning of a bible. What they don't understand is that the author wanted that portrayal to be disturbing. It was a dystopian world after all! The  message of the entire book was that banning free thought and books is unhealthy for the public. Ellen Hopkins expresses her opinion by stating " I don't sugarcoat but neither is the content gratuitous, something would be censors could only know if they'd actually read the books rather than skimming for dirty words." In this case there were also many objections with students speaking in support of the books. Showing the difference between those who read and those who censor This shows how adults have their own privileged opinion of what literature should be.

  

Parental control should be exercised on individual base, for the need of each family and child. The individual parent should be responsible for drawing the limits of supervision of sensitive material. As long as a warning is made public and children are aware of what they are about to read, there is no need to ban the material. After all it is picked by their own choice. If books were to be banned, in the first place, children should have the say somewhat in the decision making, instead of having grown ups try to comprehend children's literature. There is a reason why there are books for children and books for adults.

Inquiry question for nonfiction article.

     Tensions are rising between Obama and Putin ,Russia's president ,as Syria is unseeing weapons of mass destruction. This is not helped by the fact that Edward Snowden an information leaker has been granted asylum by Russia and that all aide provided by America has been ordered to leave. All though there is constant bickering between the two countries; what would happen if they worked together. Thomas Friedman in the passage " A New Cold War ?" states " there is no major problem and the world today ... that would not be easier to solve if the US and Russia work together?" This is true because many major issues involving U.S and Russia.

     The author shows this is true by listing all the issues involving the two countries. The author first shows issues such as the banning of American aide , prohibiting the adoption of Russian children by Americans, and reprimanding nonviolent protesters requesting a more democratic government . This includes the more recent Edward Snowden case  where Russia is granting asylum to him against U.S's approval. They all could be solved with cooperation and even Syria could be stopped . Russia supplies Syria with billions of dollars worth of weapons , then blocking any action U.S can do to stop it. If they agreed the weapon dealing could be stopped there could be possible world threat could be prevented as well. This includes the massive amounts of oil Russia has in its arsenal which along with the currenttechnology  could last a lot longer.

      Thomas Friedman is right with the  cooperation of these two countries a lot could be done. There could be the removal of another dictator who harms his citizens. There could also be the capture of someone who leaked out confidential information . There also could be aide given to those in Russia who need it and a home for a child. In conclusion if these countries cooperate a lot could be done recently Russia and America have just worked out a deal for Syria to remove its chemical weapons and much more could happen in the future.